Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 September 20266010228

Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP

Planning appeal 6010228 at Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 8 September 2026 by Inspector A Wright, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed use, having regard to local and national planning policies.

Use of land to store building materials for a temporary period of two years

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
other
Inspector
A Wright
Postcode
IP6 0BP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed use, having regard to local and national planning policies
  • the effect of the proposed scheme on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and outlook
  • whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to policies concerned with development in areas at risk of flooding
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology

What decided it

The site is not a suitable location for the proposed use having regard to settlement policy, flood risk policy, and the failure to demonstrate absence of harm to protected species, character and living conditions.

the benefits of reusing building materials are substantially outweighed by the adverse effects of unsuitability of location, harm to character and appearance, undemonstrated impacts on living conditions and protected species, and flood risk concerns

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP03Policy LP24Policy LP27Policy SP09Policy LP16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed5 August 20266007731
    Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
  2. Dismissed16 June 20266006315
    Orchard House, Cocks Road, Eye, IP23 7NT
  3. Notice upheld12 March 20263357418
    Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP
  4. Allowed22 October 20253369566
    Fennings Farm, Pixey Green, Stradbroke, Eye Suffolk, IP21 5NH
  5. Dismissed1 August 20253361001
    Barn at Moat Farm, Barrells Road, Great Green, Thurston, IP31 3SH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.