Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 October 20253369566

Fennings Farm, Pixey Green, Stradbroke, Eye Suffolk, IP21 5NH

Planning appeal 3369566 at Fennings Farm, Pixey Green, Stradbroke, Eye Suffolk, IP21 5NH (Mid Suffolk District Council) was allowed on 22 October 2025 by Inspector Phillips A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the condition requiring community liaison arrangements meets the six tests under paragraph 57 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 having regard to ongoing odour management and its effect on nearby residents.

Erection of 6no poultry houses with associated admin blocks, feed bins and ancillary development. (accompanied by EIA statement) without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref DC/21/06824, dated 24/08/2024

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Phillips A
Postcode
IP21 5NH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the condition requiring community liaison arrangements meets the six tests under paragraph 57 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 having regard to ongoing odour management and its effect on nearby residents

What decided it

The community liaison meetings requirement does not meet the test of necessity under paragraph 57 of the NPPF because the Council and Environment Agency have sufficient enforcement mechanisms through the Odour Management Plan and separate pollution control regimes.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP14Policy STRAD13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57Paragraph 198Paragraph 201

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  2. Allowed5 August 20266007731
    Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
  3. Dismissed16 June 20266006315
    Orchard House, Cocks Road, Eye, IP23 7NT
  4. Notice upheld12 March 20263357418
    Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP
  5. Dismissed1 August 20253361001
    Barn at Moat Farm, Barrells Road, Great Green, Thurston, IP31 3SH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.