Planning appeal decision
104 Gilders Road, Chessington, KT9 2AN
Planning appeal 3366821 at 104 Gilders Road, Chessington, KT9 2AN (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 15 October 2025 by Inspector Housden C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the supply of family dwellings.
conversion of the first and second floors to provide 1 studio and 1 x 1 bed self contained flats with erection of rear dormer roof extension and installation of 1no. rooflight to facilitate loft conversion. Demolition of outbuildings and erection of outbuilding to the rear garden, and provision of 3nos. parking spaces and 2nos. cycle stores
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Housden C
- Postcode
- KT9 2AN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the supply of family dwellings
- the effect of the appeal proposal on highway safety, with specific regard to whether the proposed development provides sufficient parking arrangements for the future occupiers of the development
What decided it
The failure to secure off-street parking spaces through a legally sound planning obligation, combined with the unacceptable impact on highway safety from additional on-street parking, outweighed the modest housing supply benefit in circumstances where the loss of family accommodation also conflicted with the development plan.
The adverse effects of granting permission, comprising significant harm to highway safety and moderate harm to family housing supply, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing contribution, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM14Policy DM9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 61Paragraph 109Paragraph 116Paragraph 232
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed7 October 2026601191211 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
- Dismissed29 September 2026600998856 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
- Dismissed25 September 2026600907674 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
- Allowed11 August 20266010924271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
- Dismissed3 August 20266007703Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®