Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 January 20263367099

Tuffs Farm, Tower Hill, Chipperfield, Herts, WD4 9LW

Planning appeal 3367099 at Tuffs Farm, Tower Hill, Chipperfield, Herts, WD4 9LW (Dacorum Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 January 2026 by Inspector Kirby R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.

demolition of existing agricultural buildings, construction of 4 new dwellings, associated parking and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Kirby R
Postcode
WD4 9LW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the character and appearance of the area having particular regard to the design of the new dwellings and amount of outdoor space provided to each
  • the significance of nearby heritage assets
  • the integrity of the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation
  • the living conditions of the intended future occupiers with particular regard to the provision of outdoor garden space
  • best and most versatile agricultural land and the viability of the agricultural holding
  • whether other considerations outweigh the harm to the Green Belt, and any other harm so as to amount to very special circumstances to justify the development

What decided it

The cumulative harm to the Green Belt (by reason of inappropriateness and encroachment into countryside), to the significance of three designated heritage assets (conservation area and two listed buildings), and to the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, taken together, is not clearly outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery and other considerations, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the inappropriate development.

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and encroachment, combined with less-than-substantial harm (at the lower end) to heritage assets and unmitigated harm to the SAC, outweighs the significant weight given to housing delivery benefits (addressing a 1.05-year supply), moderate weight to biodiversity net gain, and limited weight to economic and social benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS5CS12CS26CS27DBLP Policy 108DBLP saved policy 120
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 214Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

36 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dacorum

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266003892
    Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266011489
    Plot HD587047 of Lot B2A, Upper Bourne End Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 2RR
  3. Dismissed28 August 20266010273
    118 A Hempstead Road, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, WD4 8AL
  4. Notice upheld14 July 20263350930
    Land Adjancet to The Old Brickworks, Spring Garden Lane, Northchurch, Herts, HP4 3GY
  5. Dismissed17 June 20266006042
    Land South of A4251 (North of A41), Tring, HP23 5RB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.