Planning appeal decision
Land to East of Staines Rugby Football Club, Snakey Lane, TW13 7NB
Planning appeal 3367130 at Land to East of Staines Rugby Football Club, Snakey Lane, TW13 7NB (London Borough of Hounslow) was dismissed on 22 October 2025 by Inspector Lancaster K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
the erection of a storage unit and associated parking, including new site entrance
- Authority
- London Borough of Hounslow
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Lancaster K
- Postcode
- TW13 7NB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having particular regard to the development plan
- The effect of the proposed development on ecology, including whether the proposed development would deliver Biodiversity Net Gain
- Whether the proposed development would meet carbon reduction standards and achieve sustainable design to mitigate and adapt to climate change
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt which is by definition harmful, and the other harms identified (openness, character and appearance, biodiversity, highway safety, unsuitable location, and lack of sustainable design) are not clearly outweighed by the limited considerations advanced, so very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2 of the London Plan 2021Policy GB1 of the Hounslow Borough Local Plan 2015Policy CC1 of the Hounslow Borough Local Plan 2015Policy CC2 of the Hounslow Borough Local Plan 2015Policy E4 of the London Plan 2021Policy ED1 of the Hounslow Borough Local Plan 2015Policy GB7 of the Hounslow Borough Local Plan 2015Policy EQ1 of the Hounslow Borough Local Plan 2015Policy EQ2 of the Hounslow Borough Local Plan 2015Policy T4 of the London PlanPolicy T7 of the London PlanPolicy EC2 of the Hounslow Borough Local Plan 2015
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hounslow
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed23 October 2026601117145 Colonial Road, Feltham, TW14 8AA
- Dismissed13 October 2026600789992 Windmill Road, Brentford, TW8 9NA
- Dismissed20 July 2026600646688A Crispen Road, Feltham, TW13 6QR
- Dismissed10 July 20266006681395 Twickenham Road, Isleworth, TW7 7ES
- Dismissed9 July 20266002796163 Gunnersbury Lane, Ealing, Acton, W3 8LJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®