Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 September 20253367584

Long Ridge Arrow Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8LR

Planning appeal 3367584 at Long Ridge Arrow Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8LR (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 2 September 2025 by Inspector Astley-Serougi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

erection of an oak framed three bay garage with office within the roofspace

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Astley-Serougi B
Postcode
RG27 8LR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on trees protected by a Tree Preservation Order

What decided it

The proposed development would result in unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area by being conspicuously forward of the established building line and overly dominant in the streetscape, conflicting with development plan policies requiring high-quality design that assimilates with local character.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NBE9 of the Hart Local Plan Strategy and Sites 2032Policy GEN1 of the Hart Local Plan (replacement) 1996-2006 Saved policiesPolicy CON8 of the Hart Local Plan (replacement) 1996-2006 Saved policiesPolicy NEB2 of the Hart Local Plan Strategy and Sites 2032

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

34 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed8 October 20266011669
    Cedars House, Thackhams Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8JG
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266005123
    Parpan, Eversley Centre, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0NJ
  3. Allowed7 September 20266011109
    16 Cricket Green, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PP
  4. Dismissed3 September 20266004528
    Malthouse Mews, Brew House Lane, Hartley Wintney, RG27 8QA
  5. Allowed1 September 20266011801
    Esso Petrol Station, Hook Road, North Warnborough, RG29 1EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.