Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 September 20253367705

1 Glebe Close, Thorpe Bay, Essex, SS1 3DS

Planning appeal 3367705 at 1 Glebe Close, Thorpe Bay, Essex, SS1 3DS (Southend-on-Sea City Council) was dismissed on 22 September 2025 by Inspector Burley P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on designated habitats sites.

‘erect one dwellinghouse on land adjacent to 1 Glebe Close with associated amenity space and bin store, layout parking to front and form new vehicle crossover onto Butterys’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Burley P
Postcode
SS1 3DS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on designated habitats sites
  • the effect of the appeal scheme on highway safety
  • the effect of the appeal scheme on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The unmitigated harm to the integrity of designated habitats sites, for which no appropriate mitigation was provided, clearly outweighs the benefit of delivering a single dwellinghouse and provides a strong reason for refusal that engages the exception to the tilted balance.

the unmitigated harm to a designated habitats site clearly outweighs the benefit of the appeal scheme, notwithstanding significant weight attached to housing delivery in a Council without five-year housing land supply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy KP1Policy KP2Policy CP4Policy DM6Policy CP3Policy DM15Policy DM1Policy DM3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

158 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Southend-on-Sea City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013127
    3 Cobham Road,, Westcliff-on-Sea,, SS0 8EG
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266011259
    20 Tattersall Gardens, Leigh on Sea, Southend on Sea, SS92QT
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266009318
    128 Monometer House Rectory Grove, Leigh-on-sea, Southend-on-sea, SS9 2HN
  4. Dismissed2 October 20266009119
    456 Southchurch Rd, Southend, SS1 2QA
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266008855
    Shorefield Cottage 7A, Shorefield Road, Westcliff-on-Sea, SS07RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.