Planning appeal decision
80 Ash Grove, Picton, LIVERPOOL, L15 1ET
C4 Use Class HMO
- Authority
- Liverpool City Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Savage M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's refusal to grant a lawful development certificate is well-founded
What decided it
The material change of use to C4 HMO had not occurred by 17 June 2021 because the property was not physically complete, lacked the required HMO licence, and was not intended to be occupied until after that date.
Judgments cited: Welwyn Hatfield BC v SSCLG & Beesley [2011] UKSC 15; Impey v Secretary of State for the Environment (1980) 47 P & CR 157; Panton & Farmer v Secretary of State for the Environment [1999] 78 P&CR 186
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®