Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 June 20263367739

80 Ash Grove, Picton, LIVERPOOL, L15 1ET

C4 Use Class HMO

Authority
Liverpool City Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Savage M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's refusal to grant a lawful development certificate is well-founded

What decided it

The material change of use to C4 HMO had not occurred by 17 June 2021 because the property was not physically complete, lacked the required HMO licence, and was not intended to be occupied until after that date.

Judgments cited: Welwyn Hatfield BC v SSCLG & Beesley [2011] UKSC 15; Impey v Secretary of State for the Environment (1980) 47 P & CR 157; Panton & Farmer v Secretary of State for the Environment [1999] 78 P&CR 186

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.