Planning appeal decision
Signature House Ltd, Signature House 232A Rainhill Road, Rainhill, Prescot, L35 4LD
Planning appeal 3367783 at Signature House Ltd, Signature House 232A Rainhill Road, Rainhill, Prescot, L35 4LD (St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 January 2026 by Inspector Cryan M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed loss of employment land or premises has been adequately justified.
a change of use from a 19 serviced offices business centre (Use Class E) to a 17 bedroom HMO (Use Class Sui Generis)
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Cryan M
- Postcode
- L35 4LD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed loss of employment land or premises has been adequately justified
- Whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of adequate communal facilities, amenity space, and outlook and daylight
- Whether the development would be likely to lead to an increase in demand for on-street parking which would compromise safety for pedestrians and road users
What decided it
The failure to adequately justify the loss of employment premises, combined with unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers and unmitigated parking impacts, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan taken as a whole.
The moderate benefits of housing delivery and brownfield reuse in a sustainable location were outweighed by the failure to justify loss of employment use, inadequate living conditions for occupiers, and unmitigated parking and highway safety impacts.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LPA03Policy LPD01Policy LPD02Policy LPC01Policy LPA06
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed22 August 20253365925Rear of 99-101 Greenfield Road, Dentons Green, St Helens , Merseyside , WA10 6SH
- Dismissed8 March 2023331456515 The Copse, Newton-Le-Willows, WA12 9YF
- Dismissed11 November 20213275485Kenyons Lane South, Haydock, WA11 0LH
- Allowed2 July 20213270869278 Mill Lane, Sutton Leach, St. Helens, WA9 4ET
- Dismissed9 October 2026601453360 Church Road, Haydock, St. Helens, WA11 0TH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®