Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 March 20263367799

93 and 94 High Street, Rye, East Sussex, TN31 7JN

Demolition of rear extensions, formation of two -storey rear extension to provide additional ground floor accommodation and enlarge first floor domestic accommodation with access to the gardens from the first floor

Authority
Rother District Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
King T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve the Grade II listed buildings, 93 and 94 High Street, Rye, and the features of special architectural or historic interest that they possess
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to the site's location within the Rye Conservation Area
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers at nos 92, 95 and 95a

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets, assessed as less than substantial but of considerable importance and weight, was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of the scheme, and the proposal failed to preserve the special interest of the listed buildings and the character of the conservation area.

Framework references: 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy EN2, Policy RY1, Policy DHG9, Policy H2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.