Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 March 20263367799

93 and 94 High Street, Rye, East Sussex, TN31 7JN

Planning appeal 3367799 at 93 and 94 High Street, Rye, East Sussex, TN31 7JN (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 16 March 2026 by Inspector King T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve the Grade II listed buildings, 93 and 94 High Street, Rye, and the features of special architectural or historic interest that they possess.

Demolition of rear extensions, formation of two -storey rear extension to provide additional ground floor accommodation and enlarge first floor domestic accommodation with access to the gardens from the first floor

Authority
Rother District Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
King T
Postcode
TN31 7JN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve the Grade II listed buildings, 93 and 94 High Street, Rye, and the features of special architectural or historic interest that they possess
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to the site's location within the Rye Conservation Area
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers at nos 92, 95 and 95a

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets, assessed as less than substantial but of considerable importance and weight, was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of the scheme, and the proposal failed to preserve the special interest of the listed buildings and the character of the conservation area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN2Policy RY1Policy DHG9Policy H2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

30 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rother District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266015532
    65 Westfield Lane, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7NF
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266007775
    Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
  3. Dismissed12 October 20266010105
    Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
  4. Dismissed22 September 20266008634
    Barn House, Warren Road, Fairlight, TN35 4AN
  5. Allowed21 September 20266009677
    Black Cottage, Henley Down, Catsfield, TN33 9BN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.