Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to the A614, Worksop, S80 3PA
Planning appeal 3367817 at Land Adjacent to the A614, Worksop, S80 3PA (Bassetlaw District Council) was allowed on 7 April 2026 by Inspector Heward H, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the special interest of designated heritage assets: Grade I listed Clumber Park Registered Park and Garden, Grade II* listed Drayton Gate, Grade II* listed Gate Piers and Flanking Walls to Normanton Gate, and West Bridge Grade II Listed Building and Scheduled Monument.
construction and operation of a solar farm and battery energy storage system, together with all associated works, equipment, necessary infrastructure and landscaping
- Authority
- Bassetlaw District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- utilities-energy · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Heward H
- Postcode
- S80 3PA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development upon the special interest of designated heritage assets: Grade I listed Clumber Park Registered Park and Garden, Grade II* listed Drayton Gate, Grade II* listed Gate Piers and Flanking Walls to Normanton Gate, and West Bridge Grade II Listed Building and Scheduled Monument
What decided it
The significant public benefits of renewable energy generation, carbon reduction and grid connection clearly and convincingly outweighed the low levels of less than substantial harm to the setting of the affected heritage assets.
The public benefits (renewable energy, climate change mitigation, national energy security, biodiversity and landscape gains) clearly and convincingly outweighed the identified less than substantial harm to the significance of the heritage assets, and the balance tipped in favour of allowing the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ST40Policy ST41Policy ST35Policy ST33Policy ST8Policy ST49
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 161
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios v Hackney LBC; Bernard Wheatcroft v SoS for the Environment
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bassetlaw
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed22 September 20266006950Land off Middlebridge Road, Gringley-on-the-Hill, DN10 4SE
- Allowed1 September 20266007837Land South of Cave's Lane, Walkeringham, Doncaster, DN10 4LU
- Dismissed10 July 20266006108Land Between Pinders Croft And The Chapel, High Street, Walkeringham, DN10 4LJ
- Allowed25 June 20266006391Properties 3-5 Eastgate, Worksop, S80 1RH
- Dismissed31 March 20266002376Manor Gardens, Rampton, Retford, DN22 0JU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®