Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 September 20253367954

Land Adjacent To The PIT, 101 - 106 Wells Road, Totterdown, Bristol, BS4 2BS

the installation of 1no. BT Street Hub and removal of 3no. associated BT payphones

Authority
Bristol City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Simpson V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the developments/advertisements on the character and appearance, and the amenity of the areas
  • risk of crime
  • public safety, with particular regard to highway safety
  • the convenience and ease of pedestrian movement

What decided it

The harm to character, appearance, amenity, heritage significance, crime risk and highway safety caused by the proposed hubs outweighed the limited public benefits, and the schemes conflicted with the development plan when read as a whole.

The public benefits of 5G coverage, digital information and communication services, and device charging were attributed little or very little weight and did not outweigh the harm to character and appearance, heritage assets, crime risk and highway safety.

Framework references: 212

Plan policies cited: SADMP policy DM26, SADMP policy DM28, SADMP policy DM27, Core Strategy policy BCS21, BCAP policy 30, BCAP policy 41, SADMP policy DM29, SADMP policy DM31, SADMP policy DM36, BCAP policy 32, SADMP policy DM23, Core Strategy policy BCS10, Core Strategy policy BCS13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.