Planning appeal decision
Thames Valley Police Station, Hensington Road, Woodstock, Oxfordshire, OX20 1JQ
Planning appeal 3367995 at Thames Valley Police Station, Hensington Road, Woodstock, Oxfordshire, OX20 1JQ (West Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 30 December 2025 by Inspector Redford R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area.
the erection of retirement living accommodation with communal facilities, car parking, landscaping and a substation to serve the development
- Authority
- West Oxfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Redford R
- Postcode
- OX20 1JQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area
- The effect of the proposed development on the setting of designated and non-designated heritage assets
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupants residing in Bear Close, with specific regard to privacy and outlook
- Whether the proposed development can provide adequately for affordable housing and essential supporting infrastructure
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area, combined with significant harm to the privacy of neighbouring occupants at Bear Close, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the scheme.
The less than substantial heritage harm was outweighed by the public benefits of the specialist housing and infrastructure contributions, but the significant harm to character and appearance and to neighbours' privacy meant the adverse impacts of granting permission significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- OS2OS4H2H3T2T3OS5EH9EH10EH11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 63Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215Paragraph 216
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE 1982; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney 2018
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Oxfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 202660149902 Viner Close, Witney, OX28 1EP
- Allowed13 October 20266004776Land South of Ramsden, Akeman Street, Ramsden, OX7 3AY
- Notice varied and upheld18 September 20263358009Chalford Paddocks, Oxford Road, Old Chalford Chipping Norton, OX7 5QR
- Allowed9 September 20266007705Forge Garage, Church Road, Churchill, OX7 6NJ
- Dismissed2 September 2026600910346 Market Square, Witney, OX28 6AL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®