Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20253368128

229 Stoke Road, Slough, SL2 5AX

Planning appeal 3368128 at 229 Stoke Road, Slough, SL2 5AX (Slough Borough Council) was dismissed on 25 November 2025 by Inspector Reed J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether prior approval should be granted, considering the northern extension's effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of No.231 Stoke Road, with particular regard to outlook and light.

the erection of two single storey rear extensions, which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 8.0m, with a maximum height of 3m, and an eaves height of 3m

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Reed J
Postcode
SL2 5AX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether prior approval should be granted, considering the northern extension's effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of No.231 Stoke Road, with particular regard to outlook and light

What decided it

The northern extension would significantly harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through an overbearing appearance and unacceptable reduction in outlook and light, contrary to the GPDO assessment criteria and development plan policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 8 of the Slough Local Development Framework, Core Strategy 2006 - 2026 Development Plan Document (December 2008)Policy H15 of the Local Plan for Slough (March 2004)Policy EN1 of the Local Plan for Slough (March 2004)Policy EN2 of the Local Plan for Slough (March 2004)Slough Local Development Framework, Residential Extensions Guidelines Supplementary Planning Document (January 2010)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

186 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Slough

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 October 20266014084
    72 Belfast Avenue, Slough, SL1 3HL
  2. Allowed12 October 20266014315
    16 Berners Close, Cippenham, Slough, SL1 5QX
  3. Dismissed12 October 20266013643
    32, Long Furlong Drive, Slough, SL2 1QZ
  4. Dismissed8 October 20266011866
    47, Ragstone Road,, Slough,, SL1 2PP
  5. Dismissed8 October 20266011425
    Land to the Rear of 5-9 Elliman Avenue, Slough, SL2 5AZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.