Planning appeal decision
Banktop Farm Bank Top Holiday Cottages, Dilhorne, Stoke-on-Trent, ST10 2PN
Planning appeal 3368361 at Banktop Farm Bank Top Holiday Cottages, Dilhorne, Stoke-on-Trent, ST10 2PN (Staffordshire Moorlands District Council) was dismissed on 17 September 2025 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: For Appeal A: Whether the appeal site represents a suitable location for the proposal with regards to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.
change of use of three holiday cottages to Residential Dwellings (C3)
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- McDonagh C
- Postcode
- ST10 2PN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- For Appeal A: Whether the appeal site represents a suitable location for the proposal with regards to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
- For Appeal A: Whether the proposal would provide future occupiers of the dwellings with suitable living conditions
- For Appeal B: Whether the works would preserve the listed buildings, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which they possess, including their settings
What decided it
The conflict with the development plan's settlement hierarchy and spatial distribution strategy, combined with the lack of suitable living conditions and loss of tourism accommodation, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefit under NPPF paragraph 11(d), resulting in dismissal of Appeal A; Appeal B succeeded because no physical works were proposed and the change of use alone would preserve the listed buildings' special interest and significance.
The benefits of adding 3 dwellings to housing supply (limited weight) and reuse of an existing building (limited weight) were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the conflict with the development plan's spatial distribution aims, the unsustainable location requiring reliance on private vehicles (significant weight), lack of suitable living conditions for future occupiers (moderate weight), and loss of tourism accommodation conflicting with the Council's tourism strategy and NPPF paragraph 88 (further weight), resulting in dismissal of Appeal A.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy SS2Policy SS10Policy H1Policy H3Policy T1Policy DC1Policy DC2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 88Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 212
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Staffordshire Moorlands
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed9 June 20266003656The Twigg, Roughcote Lane, Caverswall, ST11 9ET
- Dismissed10 April 20266003240Side Farm, Cotton Bank, Cotton, Staffordshire, ST10 3DU
- Allowed21 November 20253366600Oakamoor Forest Lodges Ltd, Little Ranger Dimmingsdale, Oakamoor, Stoke-on-Trent, ST10 3AS
- Dismissed26 June 20253358820The Hermitage Ipstones Bank, Froghall, Stoke-on-Trent, ST10 2HQ
- Dismissed2 May 20253354499The Green Man, Ashbourne Road, Bottomhouse, Leek, Staffordshire, ST13 7QJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®