Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 September 20253368454

Oakwood, Dunstan Lane, NESTON, CH64 8TQ

loft conversion via partial raising of existing ridge height, formation of new dormer window, minor external alterations

Authority
Cheshire West and Chester
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Heron E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes a disproportionate addition to the original building measured against the 1948 baseline, amounting to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the harm to the Green Belt is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy STRAT 9, Policy DM21, Policy ENV6, Policy DM3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.