Planning appeal decision
Sherfield Oaks Golf Course, Wildmoor Lane, Sherfield-On-Loddon, HOOK, RG27 0HB
redevelopment of existing golf course maintenance yard to provide 4 no. dwellings; with associated garaging, parking, turning, landscaping, private amenity space and access. Provision of new golf course maintenance yard, and reconfiguration/expansion of golf course car park
- Authority
- Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Smith H
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to national policy, the development strategy for the area, proximity or access to services, facilities and opportunities for sustainable transport, and the transition to a low carbon future
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the Sherfield-on-Loddon Conservation Area and the setting of nearby heritage assets
- the effect of the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety, with particular regard to visibility splays for the proposed residential development
- the effect of the proposal on nearby trees and Breach Copse SINC
What decided it
The harm to the setting of the Conservation Area and the Grade II listed wall, combined with the unsuitability of the location for sustainable residential development, outweighed the modest housing benefit, particularly given the Framework's strong protection for designated heritage assets.
The modest benefit of three dwellings and economic contribution during construction was outweighed by less-than-substantial but considerable harm to designated heritage assets, harm to character and appearance, unsuitability of location for sustainable development, highway safety concerns, and harm to trees and the SINC; the Framework's heritage protection policies provided a strong reason for refusal displacing the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
Framework references: 11, 116, 129, 214, 215, 216
Plan policies cited: Policy SS1, Policy SS6, Policy CN9, Policy EM1, Policy EM4, Policy EM10, Policy EM11, Policy D1, Policy G1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®