Planning appeal decision
Land at B1004/ Bourne Lane, Much Hadham, Hertfordshire, SG10 6ER
Planning appeal 3368768 at Land at B1004/ Bourne Lane, Much Hadham, Hertfordshire, SG10 6ER (East Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 29 June 2026 by Inspector Dring G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be sited in a suitable location with regard to accessibility to services, facilities and attractions.
change of use of the land to a glamping site (sui generis), together with four cabins (holiday lets), four electric caravan/ motorhome pitches, a toilet/ shower block, a reception/ office, a community clubhouse, an internal access track, car parking, cycle parking, electric charging points, a pond and associated works
- Authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Dring G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be sited in a suitable location with regard to accessibility to services, facilities and attractions
- whether it has been demonstrated that there is an identified need for the proposed use
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety with particular regard to visibility
- the effect of the proposal on existing trees
- the effect of the proposal on protected species
- flood risk, surface water drainage and foul drainage
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole across multiple policy areas (accessibility, character, highway safety, trees, protected species, and drainage), with no material considerations indicating it should be determined otherwise.
No balancing exercise was undertaken; the proposal was found to conflict with the development plan across multiple grounds with no material considerations to outweigh the harms identified.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GBR2Policy ED2Policy TRA1Policy CFLR7Policy ED5Policy DES2Policy DES4Policy TRA2Policy DES3Policy NE3Policy WAT1Policy WAT2Policy WAT3Policy WAT5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 88Paragraph 173Paragraph 175
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed28 October 20266008487The Ranch House, Amwell Hill, Great Amwell, Ware, SG12 9QZ
- Allowed24 September 20266008238Land North of A507, West of A10, Buntingford, Buntingford, SG9 9ER
- Allowed6 August 2026600975325 Fordwich Hill, Hertford, SG14 2BG
- Dismissed29 June 20266005780Barn Field, Hay Street, Dassels, SG11 2RP
- Dismissed17 April 20263375773Land Adjacent The Mill House, Albury Road, Little Hadham, SG11 2DQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®