Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 June 20263368768

Land at B1004/ Bourne Lane, Much Hadham, Hertfordshire, SG10 6ER

change of use of the land to a glamping site (sui generis), together with four cabins (holiday lets), four electric caravan/ motorhome pitches, a toilet/ shower block, a reception/ office, a community clubhouse, an internal access track, car parking, cycle parking, electric charging points, a pond and associated works

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Dring G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be sited in a suitable location with regard to accessibility to services, facilities and attractions
  • whether it has been demonstrated that there is an identified need for the proposed use
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety with particular regard to visibility
  • the effect of the proposal on existing trees
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species
  • flood risk, surface water drainage and foul drainage

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole across multiple policy areas (accessibility, character, highway safety, trees, protected species, and drainage), with no material considerations indicating it should be determined otherwise.

No balancing exercise was undertaken; the proposal was found to conflict with the development plan across multiple grounds with no material considerations to outweigh the harms identified.

Framework references: 88, 173, 175

Plan policies cited: Policy GBR2, Policy ED2, Policy TRA1, Policy CFLR7, Policy ED5, Policy DES2, Policy DES4, Policy TRA2, Policy DES3, Policy NE3, Policy WAT1, Policy WAT2, Policy WAT3, Policy WAT5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.