Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 April 20263375773

Land Adjacent The Mill House, Albury Road, Little Hadham, SG11 2DQ

erection of two dwellings and associated development

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowyer J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to the effect of the proposal on trees
  • the effect of the proposal on the significance of heritage assets
  • whether or not the development would be in a suitable location having regard to flood risk
  • the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
  • whether or not there would be adequate provision for biodiversity net gain

What decided it

The proposal would cause harm to the significance of the Little Hadham Conservation Area that would not be outweighed by public benefits, and would fail to demonstrate safe access and escape routes in a flood risk area, together with unacceptable harm to character and appearance.

The limited public benefits of housing delivery and economic/social benefits were insufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area (which attracted considerable weight), the limited harm to listed buildings (which was outweighed by benefits), the unacceptable harm to character and appearance, and the failure to demonstrate safety from flood risk.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy VILL2, Policy GBR2, Policy DES4, Policy HOU12, Policy DES3, Policy NE3, Policy HA1, Policy HA4, Policy HA7, Policy WAT1, Policy WAT5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.