Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed27 August 20253368786

33 Eastfield Grove, WOLVERHAMPTON, WV1 2RF

first floor extension

Authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hughes L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 34 Eastfield Grove with regards to outlook and light

What decided it

The extension's rear location, limited visibility, subservient scale and positioning set in from the boundary, combined with compliance with the 45-degree daylight test, ensured it would not harm character and appearance or the living conditions of neighbours.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4, Policy D6, Policy D7, Policy D8, Policy D9, Policy H6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.