Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Fellowsfield, Mill Lane, Hertfordshire, SG12 0JL
Planning appeal 3369221 at Land Adjacent to Fellowsfield, Mill Lane, Hertfordshire, SG12 0JL (East Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 20 November 2025 by Inspector Laver J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area and access to services and facilities.
demolition of outbuildings and erection of a subterranean net-zero house incorporating landscape and biodiversity enhancements
- Authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Laver J
- Postcode
- SG12 0JL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area and access to services and facilities
- whether the proposal would increase the likelihood of flooding elsewhere and/or increase the risk of pollution to controlled waters
- whether the proposal would make adequate provision for waste storage and collection
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable vehicular access and turning arrangements
What decided it
The unsuitable location requiring high reliance on private motor vehicles, combined with unresolved flood risk and pollution concerns and inadequate waste collection arrangements, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of providing one dwelling under the tilted balance test.
The benefits of providing one additional dwelling, improving the site's appearance, and delivering biodiversity net gain were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of the unsuitable location, flooding and pollution risks, and inadequate waste storage and collection provision, when assessed against the Framework policies taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DPS2Policy DPS3Policy GBR2Policy TRA1Policy TRA2Policy WAT1Policy EQ1Policy DES4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 89Paragraph 110
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed28 October 20266008487The Ranch House, Amwell Hill, Great Amwell, Ware, SG12 9QZ
- Allowed24 September 20266008238Land North of A507, West of A10, Buntingford, Buntingford, SG9 9ER
- Allowed6 August 2026600975325 Fordwich Hill, Hertford, SG14 2BG
- Dismissed29 June 20263368768Land at B1004/ Bourne Lane, Much Hadham, Hertfordshire, SG10 6ER
- Dismissed29 June 20266005780Barn Field, Hay Street, Dassels, SG11 2RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®