Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20253369384

The Cottage Withindale Lane, Long Melford, Sudbury, CO10 9HS

Planning appeal 3369384 at The Cottage Withindale Lane, Long Melford, Sudbury, CO10 9HS (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 6 November 2025 by Inspector Fallon R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area.

Erection of a two-storey side extension following demolition of an existing single-storey extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fallon R
Postcode
CO10 9HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area

What decided it

The two-storey extension's height, bulk and neo-classical architectural style would be unsympathetic to and harm the character and appearance of the existing simple rural-domestic bungalow, conflicting with development plan policies and NPPF design requirements.

The limited economic, environmental and social benefits of the extension were outweighed by the adverse impacts on character and appearance when assessed against development plan policies and other material considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP03Policy LP24Policy SP09Policy LM08
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 139

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Babergh District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed7 October 20266011354
    Land at Junction of Friars Street and Church Street, Sudbury, CO10 2AJ
  2. Allowed16 September 20266013583
    57 Vale View Road, Sproughton, Ipswich, IP8 3FS
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266011384
    34 Aldham Road, Hadleigh, IP7 6BP
  4. Allowed7 August 20266007359
    Oaks Farm, Hadleigh Road, Holton St Mary, CO7 6NW
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266005638
    Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.