Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 December 20253369736

28 Howard Place, STOKE-ON-TRENT, ST1 4NJ

the “change of use for the sale of hot and cold drinks and food (sui generis) for a temporary three year period and Pyenest Street vehicle access widened (part-retrospective)

Authority
Stoke-on-Trent City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Love D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is an appropriate location for a hot food takeaway with regard to its proximity to places where young people congregate

What decided it

The site's proximity to places where young people congregate, particularly Stoke-on-Trent College at 150 metres distance, means it fails to comply with paragraph 97 of the NPPF which restricts hot food takeaways in such locations outside town centres.

Framework references: 97

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.