Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 February 20263369761

72-78 Nottingham Road, Stapleford, NG9 8AQ

Authority
Broxtowe Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the details submitted in respect of the reserved matters are acceptable, having regard to the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the details submitted in respect of the reserved matters are acceptable, having regard to highway safety
  • whether the details submitted in respect of the reserved matters are acceptable, having regard to the standard of accommodation for prospective occupants

What decided it

The amended plans directly addressed the Council's initial concerns and, when considered against the development plan policies and site context, demonstrated that the reserved matters would preserve character and appearance, highway safety and provide acceptable accommodation standards.

Plan policies cited: Policy 10 of the Broxtowe Aligned Core Strategy (2014), Policy 17 of the Part 2 Local Plan (2019)

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982) 43 P & CR 233; R (oao Holborn Studios Ltd) v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.