Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 December 20253369847

30 St. Marys Avenue Central, Southall, UB2 4LT

Planning appeal 3369847 at 30 St. Marys Avenue Central, Southall, UB2 4LT (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 12 December 2025 by Inspector Hole K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be at an unacceptable risk of flooding.

for the construction of part first floor/part two storey side extension, and extension of the hipped roof of the property, a dormer extension, a two-storey rear extension and a single storey rear extension, along with minor alterations

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hole K
Postcode
UB2 4LT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be at an unacceptable risk of flooding
  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Norwood Green Conservation Area

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the proposed development would not be at an unacceptable risk of flooding due to insufficient information in the Flood Risk Assessment, which was the determining factor in dismissing the appeal despite the acceptable conservation area impact.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SI 12 of the London Plan 2021Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document 2013Policy D3 of the London PlanPolicy D4 of the London PlanPolicy HC1 of the London PlanPolicy 7.4 of the Ealing DPDPolicy 7.B of the Ealing DPDPolicy 7C of the Ealing DPD

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

269 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266014340
    21 Northcote Avenue, Southall, UB1 2AX
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266012839
    Station Parade, Advertising Right Adj 1 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, W5 3LD
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  5. Dismissed12 October 20266012335
    Land Rear of 4 Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 9AT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.