Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed16 February 20263369875

Rotherfield Gerrards Cross Road, Stoke Poges, SLOUGH, SL2 4EJ

a part two storey/part single storey rear extension, first floor side extension, attached double garage to front, hip to gable front roof extension, gable to hip side roof alteration, 3 rear dormers and 2 front skylights and changes to windows without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref PL/22/0492/FA, dated 4 November 2022

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hughes S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the central modern window and the alterations to the height and siting of the development on the character and appearance of the area and the non-designated heritage asset, known as Clevehurst Lodge
  • the effects of the central modern window and the alterations to the height and siting of the development on the outdoor living conditions of the occupiers of Clevehurst Lodge

What decided it

The minimal physical differences between the amended and consented schemes, combined with the existing mature vegetation screening and the property's varied architectural context, mean the development does not cause material harm to character, appearance or neighbouring amenity.

Plan policies cited: Policy EP3 of the South Bucks District Local Plan, Policy SP6 of the Stoke Poges Neighbourhood Plan, Policy SP7 of the Stoke Poges Neighbourhood Plan, Policy LB03 of the Stoke Poges Neighbourhood Plan, Policy LB04 of the Stoke Poges Neighbourhood Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.