Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear (West) of 83 Cotes Road, Barrow Upon Soar, LE12 8JP
Planning appeal 3370033 at Land to the Rear (West) of 83 Cotes Road, Barrow Upon Soar, LE12 8JP (Charnwood Borough Council) was allowed on 26 May 2026 by Inspector Hockenhull H, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the concept masterplan and development brief achieve a comprehensive development for the wider allocation achieving high quality design in respect to access, open space, landscape, education, ecology and heritage.
outline planning application for residential development including associated infrastructure and open space, demolition of 87 Cotes Road and refurbishment works to 83 Cotes Road, plus details of access
- Authority
- Charnwood Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hockenhull H
- Postcode
- LE12 8JP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the concept masterplan and development brief achieve a comprehensive development for the wider allocation achieving high quality design in respect to access, open space, landscape, education, ecology and heritage.
- Whether the proposed development represents high quality design and whether the site capacity is appropriate.
- Whether the appeal proposal achieves an appropriate biodiversity net gain having regard to the biodiversity mitigation hierarchy.
- Whether the proposed development protects and enhances the natural environment including existing trees on the site and whether appropriate mitigation is proposed.
- Whether the proposed drainage strategy is appropriate to address surface water and avoid adverse impacts on the nearby Local Wildlife Site (LWS) and landscape character.
- Whether the proposal provides the necessary Infrastructure to mitigate its impacts with particular regard to the provision of open space, education and off-site highway improvement works.
What decided it
The proposal's compliance, subject to conditions and the completed s.106/Unilateral Undertaking, with the site allocation policy (DS2/HA49) and other development plan policies, such that the development plan taken as a whole was not breached and no material considerations indicated otherwise.
The limited, highly localised landscape harm and the harm from loss of TPO'd trees for site access were outweighed by the scheme's compliance with the site allocation and wider development plan policies and its delivery of much-needed market and affordable housing, and the appeal was allowed in accordance with the plan rather than through application of the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS2 (HA49)Policy DS4Policy EV6Policy EV7Policy EV1Policy EV9Policy INF1Policy INF2Policy H1Policy H2Policy H3Policy H6Policy CC4Policy DS1Policy BuS4Policy BuS1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 187Paragraph 193Paragraph 136Paragraph 80
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Charnwood
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed5 October 2026600943334 - 36 Station Road, Rearsby, LE7 4YY
- Allowed29 September 20266010437Simtec Materials Handling, Unit 116, The Burrows, East Goscote, LE7 3XD
- Dismissed20 October 2025336962349 Iveshead Road, Shepshed, Leicestershire , LE12 9EP
- Dismissed17 October 2025335765820C Main Street, South Croxton, Leicestershire, LE7 3RJ
- Dismissed16 September 2025335558225 Town Green Street, Rothley, Leicester, LE7 7NU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®