Planning appeal decision
Turkey Oak Cottage Bentleys Farm Lane, Higher Whitley, WARRINGTON, WA4 4QN
conversion of four modern agricultural buildings to create eight new residential dwellings
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Moulton E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety with particular regard to access visibility, the lack of a footpath in front of Holly Barn and Cedar Barn, and width
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of Holly Barn and Cedar Barn, with particular reference to noise and disturbance from vehicular movements
- Whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to outlook and the provision of private amenity space
- The effect of the proposal on biodiversity
- Whether it would enhance or preserve the character or appearance of the Higher Whitley Conservation Area and the area, and the effect of the proposal on the significance of the Conservation Area as a designated heritage asset
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness in the Green Belt, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial and long-lasting adverse impacts on highway safety, living conditions of existing and future occupiers, and unresolved biodiversity concerns significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing contribution and economic activity.
The moderate benefits of housing delivery and economic activity were substantially outweighed by the significant harms to highway safety, living conditions of existing and future occupiers, and unresolved biodiversity concerns, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
Framework references: 11, 143, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158
Plan policies cited: Policy STRAT9, Policy DM22, Policy STRAT10, Policy T5, Policy SOC5, Policy DM2, Policy ENV4, Policy DM44, Policy ENV5, Policy ENV6, Policy DM3, Policy DM46, Policy SOC1, Policy DM23
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®