Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 November 20253370183

Turkey Oak Cottage Bentleys Farm Lane, Higher Whitley, Warrington, WA4 4QN

Planning appeal 3370183 at Turkey Oak Cottage Bentleys Farm Lane, Higher Whitley, Warrington, WA4 4QN (Cheshire West and Chester) was dismissed on 17 November 2025 by Inspector Moulton E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

conversion of four modern agricultural buildings to create eight new residential dwellings

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Moulton E
Postcode
WA4 4QN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety with particular regard to access visibility, the lack of a footpath in front of Holly Barn and Cedar Barn, and width
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of Holly Barn and Cedar Barn, with particular reference to noise and disturbance from vehicular movements
  • Whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to outlook and the provision of private amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on biodiversity
  • Whether it would enhance or preserve the character or appearance of the Higher Whitley Conservation Area and the area, and the effect of the proposal on the significance of the Conservation Area as a designated heritage asset
  • Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness in the Green Belt, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial and long-lasting adverse impacts on highway safety, living conditions of existing and future occupiers, and unresolved biodiversity concerns significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing contribution and economic activity.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery and economic activity were substantially outweighed by the significant harms to highway safety, living conditions of existing and future occupiers, and unresolved biodiversity concerns, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy STRAT9Policy DM22Policy STRAT10Policy T5Policy SOC5Policy DM2Policy ENV4Policy DM44Policy ENV5Policy ENV6Policy DM3Policy DM46Policy SOC1Policy DM23
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 158

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266008480
    Moorsbarrow Hall Farm, Brereton Lane, Sproston, CW10 0JX
  2. Allowed22 October 20266009366
    Land Adjacent Mangoletsi Ltd, London Road, Allostock, Northwich, WA16 9NS
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266013998
    Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266012737
    Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266011029
    Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.