Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 November 20253370471

34 Brickendon Green, Brickendon, Hertfordshire, SG13 8PB

the erection of a two-storey rear extension, single storey extension with roof lights and fenestration. Z `

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jarvis P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on Green Belt openness
  • The effect on the Brickendon Conservation Area
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would result in disproportionate additions to the original dwelling (133% increase in floorspace), constituting inappropriate Green Belt development that causes harm to openness and the conservation area, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify approval.

Framework references: 154, 211, 215, 153

Plan policies cited: Policy GBR1, Policy HA4, Policy DES4, Policy HOU11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.