Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 November 20253370490

40 Cross Lane East, Gravesend, Kent, DA12 5HB

erection of a single two-bedroom dwelling

Authority
Gravesham Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Reid L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to outlook, daylight, amenity space and privacy
  • Whether the proposal would secure biodiversity net gain

What decided it

The conflict with the development plan on character and appearance, living conditions, and biodiversity net gain, combined with the modest quantum of housing delivery, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of the proposal.

The minor contribution to housing supply and modest economic and social benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the conflict with the development plan, adverse impacts to character and appearance, impact on amenity of future occupiers, failure to demonstrate biodiversity net gain, and lack of mitigation for the SPA and Ramsar site.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CS19, Policy CS12

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.