Planning appeal decision
40 Cross Lane East, Gravesend, Kent, DA12 5HB
erection of a single two-bedroom dwelling
- Authority
- Gravesham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Reid L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to outlook, daylight, amenity space and privacy
- Whether the proposal would secure biodiversity net gain
What decided it
The conflict with the development plan on character and appearance, living conditions, and biodiversity net gain, combined with the modest quantum of housing delivery, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of the proposal.
The minor contribution to housing supply and modest economic and social benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the conflict with the development plan, adverse impacts to character and appearance, impact on amenity of future occupiers, failure to demonstrate biodiversity net gain, and lack of mitigation for the SPA and Ramsar site.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy CS19, Policy CS12
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®