Planning appeal decision
Notice upheld4 February 20263370526
11 Howmead, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, GL13 9AR
- Authority
- Stroud District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Moss J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether, prior to the issue of the notice, a period of four years has passed beginning with the date on which the operational development referred to in the notice was substantially completed (ground (d))
- Whether the steps required by the notice to be taken, or the activities required by the notice to cease, exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control (ground (f))
What decided it
The appellants failed to prove, on the balance of probability, that the outbuilding and patio were substantially completed (in their fully finished, intended form) before 2 July 2021, so the four-year immunity period had not elapsed.
Judgments cited: Sage v SSETR & Maidstone BC [2003] UKHL 22; [2003] JPL 1299
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®