Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld4 February 20263370526

11 Howmead, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, GL13 9AR

Authority
Stroud District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Moss J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether, prior to the issue of the notice, a period of four years has passed beginning with the date on which the operational development referred to in the notice was substantially completed (ground (d))
  • Whether the steps required by the notice to be taken, or the activities required by the notice to cease, exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control (ground (f))

What decided it

The appellants failed to prove, on the balance of probability, that the outbuilding and patio were substantially completed (in their fully finished, intended form) before 2 July 2021, so the four-year immunity period had not elapsed.

Judgments cited: Sage v SSETR & Maidstone BC [2003] UKHL 22; [2003] JPL 1299

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.