Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld4 February 20263370571

23 Howmead, BERKELEY, GL13 9AR

Authority
Stroud District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Moss J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the location of the development is acceptable, having regard to the relevant policies and guidance on the matter of its location
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The unacceptable countryside location and resulting harm to rural character of the site, contrary to the development plan, outweighed the appellants' case for planning permission despite partial immunity being established under ground (d).

The harm caused by the location and character/appearance impacts of the change of use and operational development, whether on the whole or part of the site, was found to conflict with the development plan as a whole, and no material considerations were of sufficient weight to justify determining the deemed application otherwise.

Plan policies cited: Policy CP3, Policy CP15, Policy CP14, Policy ES7, Policy ES12, Core policy 1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.