Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20253371001

The Grey Horse, Front Street, Camperdown, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE12 5UT

Planning appeal 3371001 at The Grey Horse, Front Street, Camperdown, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE12 5UT (North Tyneside Council) was dismissed on 25 November 2025 by Inspector Caines A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on a designated area of open space, having regard to local policies.

conversion of pub (A4) into 4no retail units plus 6no apartments (C3) with 8no new build apartments to rear – 4no retail and 14no apartments in total with associated parking. Update to Application No: 20/01572/FUL”

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Caines A
Postcode
NE12 5UT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on a designated area of open space, having regard to local policies
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect on the significance of the Grey Horse, a non-designated heritage asset
  • Whether the development would provide its occupiers with acceptable living conditions, having regard to outlook, headroom, noise, servicing and garden space
  • The effect on highway safety, having regard to servicing arrangements
  • The effect on protected species
  • The effect on a designated wildlife corridor and biodiversity
  • Whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that surface water drainage can be appropriately managed
  • Whether the necessary planning obligations have been secured to mitigate the impacts of the development

What decided it

The cumulative effect of substantial harms—loss of designated open space, considerable harm to a non-designated heritage asset, substandard living conditions, unacceptable highway safety risks, inadequate protected species mitigation, and absence of a completed planning obligation—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

The moderate benefits of delivering 14 dwellings and introducing retail units, in the context of a substantial housing land supply shortfall of 3.37 years, were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the cumulative substantial harms to heritage, open space, living conditions, highway safety, biodiversity and the absence of mitigation through planning obligations, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply and the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM5.2Policy DM5.3Policy DM6.1Policy DM4.9Policy DM7.4Policy DM5.5Policy DM5.7Policy DM5.14Policy S5.4Policy S7.1Policy DM4.7Policy DM5.6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 182Paragraph 187Paragraph 192Paragraph 193Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Tyneside

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed23 September 20266006322
    Land at Backworth Business Park, Eccleston Close, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE27 0RX
  2. Allowed28 October 20253368345
    Unit 13 To 14 Collingwood Centre, Preston North Road, North Shields, North Tyneside, NE29 9QR
  3. Dismissed5 June 20253360508
    56 The Meadows, Wallsend, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE28 7QA
  4. Allowed24 April 20253359405
    80 Station Road, Wallsend, NE28 6TD
  5. Allowed10 February 20253349613
    69 Briardene Way, Backworth, North Tyneside, NE27 0XQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.