Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed1 December 20253371018

Land north of Woods Lane, Cliddesden, Hampshire, RG25 2JF

the erection of 4 detached single dwellings

Authority
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cuthbert L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect on the significance of the designated heritage asset of Cliddesden Conservation Area, by virtue of development within the setting of the CA

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, triggering paragraph 11 of the Framework, meant that the significant benefits of housing delivery outweighed the conflict with the development plan.

the significant benefits of housing delivery and socio-economic benefits outweighed the moderate weight of conflict with the development strategy in the context of a 2.94-year housing land supply shortfall

Framework references: 11, 61, 213

Plan policies cited: Policy SS1, Policy SS6, Policy EM1, Policy EM10, Policy EM11, Policy DD1, Policy DD2, Policy ENV1, Policy ENV5, Policy H1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.