Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld22 July 20263371020

16 Lichfield Grove, LONDON, N3 2JP

Without planning permission, the making of a material change of use of the outbuilding to use as a self-contained dwellinghouse

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Griffin E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the outbuilding has been used as a self-contained dwellinghouse (ground (b))
  • Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach (ground (f))

What decided it

The outbuilding possessed the distinctive characteristics of a dwellinghouse by providing facilities required for day-to-day private domestic existence, and the appellant's evidence that it was used only as ancillary office/gym space was not credible given the presence of a fitted kitchen, washing machine, shower room and sofa bed.

Judgments cited: Gravesham BC v SoS for the Environment (1982) 47 P&CR 142; Murfitt v SSE [1980] JPL 598

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.