Planning appeal decision
Bantony, Silverhill, Robertsbridge, East Sussex, TN32 5PA
Planning appeal 3371146 at Bantony, Silverhill, Robertsbridge, East Sussex, TN32 5PA (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 12 December 2025 by Inspector Courtney T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning the provision of housing in the district.
the erection of a single dwelling
- Authority
- Rother District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Courtney T
- Postcode
- TN32 5PA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning the provision of housing in the district
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, and whether it would conserve and enhance the landscape and scenic beauty of the High Weald National Landscape
- the effect of the proposal on the setting of the Grade II listed building Bantony
What decided it
The harmful impacts on the High Weald National Landscape and the setting of the listed building, to which great weight must be given, are not outweighed by the limited benefits of a single dwelling.
The modest benefits of housing delivery and economic activity do not outweigh the significant harm to the spatial housing strategy, the character and appearance of the National Landscape, and the less than substantial but considerable harm to the setting of the listed building.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- OSS1OSS2OSS3OSS4RA2RA3SRM1TR3EN1EN2EN3DIM2DEN1DEN2HO1IN4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rother District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed22 October 2026601553265 Westfield Lane, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7NF
- Dismissed14 October 20266007775Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
- Dismissed12 October 20266010105Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
- Dismissed22 September 20266008634Barn House, Warren Road, Fairlight, TN35 4AN
- Allowed21 September 20266009677Black Cottage, Henley Down, Catsfield, TN33 9BN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®