Planning appeal decision
Vine Lodge, Church Road, Isleworth, TW7 4PH
Planning appeal 3371379 at Vine Lodge, Church Road, Isleworth, TW7 4PH (London Borough of Hounslow) was dismissed on 20 February 2026 by Inspector Savage K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the demolition of the dwelling and the proposed replacement building on character and appearance of the Spring Grove Conservation Area (SGCA), taking into consideration its status as a locally listed building.
demolition of existing building and creation of 6 self-contained flats with bin storage, cycle store and car park
- Authority
- London Borough of Hounslow
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Savage K
- Postcode
- TW7 4PH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the demolition of the dwelling and the proposed replacement building on character and appearance of the Spring Grove Conservation Area (SGCA), taking into consideration its status as a locally listed building
- Whether the proposal would deliver a suitable mix of housing
- The effects of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants
- The effect of the proposal on existing trees
- Whether the proposal would be acceptable in terms of addressing mandatory biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements
- Whether the proposal would be acceptable in respect of addressing carbon dioxide emissions
What decided it
The less-than-substantial harm to the heritage significance of the Spring Grove Conservation Area resulting from the demolition of the non-designated heritage asset and the incongruous replacement building, to which the Framework directs great weight, was not outweighed by the modest housing and economic benefits of the proposal.
The less-than-substantial harm to the heritage significance of the conservation area and the loss of the non-designated heritage asset, together with harm to neighbours' living conditions, housing mix, trees, biodiversity net gain and carbon emissions, outweighed the benefits of five additional residential units and limited economic activity, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D4Policy D6Policy HC1Policy CC1Policy CC2Policy CC4Policy SC4Policy SC3Policy H10Policy G7Policy EQ5Policy D13Policy D14Policy G6Policy GB7Policy EQ1Policy EQ2Policy SI2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 215Paragraph 216
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hounslow
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed24 September 2026601065214 Turnham Green Terrace Mews, Chiswick, London, W4 1QU
- Allowed13 July 20266006483Units 4 and 10 Turnham Green Terrace Mews, Chiswick, London, W4 1QU
- Dismissed10 July 20266006681395 Twickenham Road, Isleworth, TW7 7ES
- Dismissed9 July 20266002796163 Gunnersbury Lane, Ealing, Acton, W3 8LJ
- Allowed24 June 2026600461917 Greencroft Road, Hounslow, TW5 0BQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®