Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 January 20263371441

Gloucester Hotel, 167 Queens Drive, Hackney, LONDON, N4 2AR

refurbishment and extension of the existing building and the construction of a further building to the rear of the existing building, to create and additional aparthotel accommodation (Class C1)

Authority
London Borough of Hackney
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Burnham T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal should be accompanied by a planning obligation in order to comply with the development strategy for the area with regard to providing car free development and with regard to carbon offsetting to mitigate impact on climate change
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Brownswood Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with regard to outlook and privacy

What decided it

The absence of a planning obligation to secure car-free development and carbon offsetting contributions meant the proposal could not comply with the development plan's requirements for sustainable transport and climate change mitigation.

Plan policies cited: Policy LP55, Policy SI 2, Policy LP45, Policy T6, Policy D1, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy HC1, Policy LP1, Policy LP3, Policy LP2, Policy SI 4, Policy LP54

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.