Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 October 20253371558

Church Farm Barn, Shingay Cum Wendy, Royston, SG8 0HJ

a first floor front extension, two storey rear extension, reconfiguration of stables to garage/workshop and replacement windows and doors

Authority
South Cambridgeshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Down K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed front and rear extensions and alterations on the character and appearance of the host dwelling, including its significance as a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The proposed rear extension would materially detract from the character, appearance and heritage significance of the barn as a non-designated heritage asset, conflicting with local plan policies and the NPPF requirement to preserve heritage assets.

Framework references: 216

Plan policies cited: Policy S/7, Policy HQ/1, Policy H/13, Policy NH/14

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.