Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 March 20263371778

5 Llanvair Drive, Ascot, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL5 9HS

Planning appeal 3371778 at 5 Llanvair Drive, Ascot, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL5 9HS (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 11 March 2026 by Inspector Murphy S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

subdivision of existing dwelling into 2x semi-detached dwellings with garage conversion, single storey and two storey rear extensions, first floor extension, new roof and 1no front canopy. Along with formation of new access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Murphy S
Postcode
SL5 9HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect on the living conditions of the occupants of 3 Llanvair Drive with reference to outlook, privacy, sunlight and daylight
  • whether the proposal would secure acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of Plot 2
  • the effect of the proposal on trees, including protected trees
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for cycle storage
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA)
  • the effect of the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety
  • effects on priority species and provision of biodiversity net gain (BNG)
  • whether the proposal complies with the adopted policies relating to climate change and carbon emissions

What decided it

The unmitigated significant adverse effect on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA, combined with substantial harm to character and appearance and failure to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, provided a strong reason for refusal that outweighed the housing delivery benefit.

The benefits of delivering one additional dwelling and economic benefits during construction and occupation were outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance, significant overbearing impact on neighbouring amenity, failure to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, pressure on protected trees, substandard cycle storage, and unmitigated significant adverse effect on the SPA integrity.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy QP3Policy HO5Policy NP/DG1.1Policy NP/DG1.2Policy NP/DG1.3Policy NR3Policy NR2Policy NR4Policy IF2Policy SP2Policy NP/EN2Policy NP/EN4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 194
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

81 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 July 20266008433
    Jones House, High Street, Bray, SL6 2AH
  2. Allowed15 July 20266005399
    Land South of Garden Cottage, Fifield Road, Fifield, SL6 2NZ
  3. Dismissed13 May 20266003174
    31 Temple Road, Windsor, SL4 1HP
  4. Dismissed10 March 20266002014
    Salon 227 227 Coppermill Road, Wraysbury, Staines, TW19 5NW
  5. Dismissed26 January 20263372603
    Land Adjacent To 6 Stuart Close Windsor , Windsor, SL4 5NU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.