Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 December 20253371826

The Beeches, Wych Hill Lane, Woking, Surrey, GU22 0AH

Planning appeal 3371826 at The Beeches, Wych Hill Lane, Woking, Surrey, GU22 0AH (Woking Borough Council) was allowed on 22 December 2025 by Inspector Marriott H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, with specific regard to flood risk.

‘the construction of a two-storey rear infill extension and part first floor rear extension to provide 1no. additional two-storey, two-bedroom unit, as well as alterations to the roof including the removal of a chimney breast and the addition of rooflights a nd enlargement of existing front balconies; all together with all other minor internal alterations ’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Marriott H
Postcode
GU22 0AH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, with specific regard to flood risk
  • the effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (TBSPA)

What decided it

The updated Planning Practice Guidance on flood risk and the proportionate sequential test, combined with the appellant's detailed flood risk assessment demonstrating adequate mitigation measures and the secured Section 106 agreement for Thames Basin Heaths SPA mitigation, addressed the reasons for dismissal of the previous appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS9Policy CS8Policy CS17saved Policy NRM6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 175

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

159 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Woking Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266013661
    10 Moor Lane, Woking, GU22 9QY
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266006780
    East House, Chobham Road, Woking, GU21 2TU
  3. Allowed19 August 20266010130
    291, Albert Drive, Woking, GU21 5TU
  4. Allowed11 August 20266007844
    34, Norfolk Farm Road, Woking, GU22 8LF
  5. Allowed7 August 20266007333
    Woodhatch Cottage, 62 Woodham Road, Horsell, Woking, GU21 4EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.