Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 December 20253371909

34 - 36 York Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 8NW

Planning appeal 3371909 at 34 - 36 York Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 8NW (Oxford City Council) was dismissed on 18 December 2025 by Inspector Marley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

described in the application form as “Conversion of two existing outbuildings to create an ancillary annexe. Insertion of 1no. door to west elevation & installation of solar panels to roof (retrospective)

Authority
Oxford City Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marley D
Postcode
OX3 8NW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would result in the creation of a separate dwellinghouse
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of external amenity space
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance, and odour

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance arising from the asymmetrical design of the joined outbuildings, which would appear contrived and out of context within the street scene, outweighed all other considerations and justified dismissal of the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DH1Policy H15Policy RE7Policy H16Policy H14Policy RE8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

129 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Oxford City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed7 October 20266013373
    27 Norham Road, Oxford, OX2 6SQ
  2. Dismissed19 June 20266004215
    6 Marsh Lane, Oxford, OX3 0NF
  3. Allowed10 June 20266004015
    94 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6JT
  4. Dismissed19 December 20253372684
    58 Dashwood Road, Oxford, OX4 4SH
  5. Allowed8 September 20253368318
    Mcdonalds Restaurants Ltd, 44-46 Cornmarket Street, Oxford, OX1 3HA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.