Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 January 20263372149

98-100 East Street, BRISTOL, BS3 4EY

Authority
Bristol City Council
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Unknown
Inspector
Perrins N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area including the Bedminster Conservation Area
  • Living conditions of existing residents in respect of privacy and whether appropriate living conditions would be secured for future occupiers with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the special significance of the Bedminster Conservation Area, combined with harm to living conditions through mutual overlooking, provides a strong reason for refusal that outweighs the modest public benefits of 6 dwellings.

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area and harm to living conditions of existing and future occupiers outweighed the public benefits of 6 dwellings on a previously developed site in a sustainable location, which would make only a limited contribution to the Council's housing supply shortfall.

Framework references: 11, 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy BCS21, Policy BCS22, Policy BCS13, Policy BCS14, Policy DM27, Policy DM28, Policy DM29, Policy DM31

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.