Planning appeal decision
Mayfield House, New Lane, Eagland Hill, Pilling, Lancashire, PR3 6BA
Without planning permission, the material change of use of land from a use for agriculture to a residential use and, without planning permission, the erection of a dwellinghouse
- Authority
- Wyre Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Harbottle M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the erection of the dwellinghouse is appropriate to the countryside location having regard to the development plan's development strategy.
- Its effect on the open and rural character of the countryside.
- Whether there is safe and adequate vehicular, cycle and pedestrian access to and from the dwellinghouse.
What decided it
The dwellinghouse's conflict with the countryside development strategy combined with its unsustainable, inadequate access was decisive in refusing the deemed planning application.
the benefit of the dwellinghouse facilitating care for the appellant's parents did not outweigh the harm arising from its conflict with the countryside development strategy and its unsustainable access
Plan policies cited: SP1, SP2, SP4, HP4, CDMP3, CDMP6
Judgments cited: Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin's Iron and Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1 KB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No.2) [2000] 2 PLR 102; Lowe v First Secretary of State [2003] EWHC 537 (Admin)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®