Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 January 20263372475

32 Manorford Avenue, West Bromwich, B71 3QJ

Planning appeal 3372475 at 32 Manorford Avenue, West Bromwich, B71 3QJ (Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 21 January 2026 by Inspector Morris T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the proposed development would comply with the permitted development requirements set by Article 3, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO, with specific regard to the impact of the proposed development on the amenity of adjoining premises, with particular regards to outlook and light.

a kitchen extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T
Postcode
B71 3QJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether the proposed development would comply with the permitted development requirements set by Article 3, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO, with specific regard to the impact of the proposed development on the amenity of adjoining premises, with particular regards to outlook and light
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of 34 Manorford Avenue, with regards to outlook and light

What decided it

The substantial depth, mass and proximity of both proposed extensions to neighbouring properties' windows would cause unacceptable harm to outlook and daylight provision for occupiers of the adjoining dwellings, contrary to permitted development requirements and development plan policy.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SAD EOS 9Policy ENV3Revised Residential Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2014)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266014671
    68 Abbotsford Avenue, Great Barr, Birmingham, B43 6HD
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266012406
    64 Wolverhampton Road, Oldbury, B68 0LJ
  3. Allowed23 September 20266010155
    Former Crown Inn, 97 Station Road, Cradley Heath, B64 6NT
  4. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263371483
    48 Parsons Hill, Oldbury, B68 9BS
  5. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263371468
    50 Parsons Hill, Oldbury, B68 9BS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.