Planning appeal decision
Land at Little Common Lane, Bletchingley, Surrey, RH1 4LL
Planning appeal 3372745 at Land at Little Common Lane, Bletchingley, Surrey, RH1 4LL (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 14 January 2026 by Inspector Lo S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of proposed development's location, land use and amount of development on the habitat and character and appearance of the area.
the erection of dwellings
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Lo S
- Postcode
- RH1 4LL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of proposed development's location, land use and amount of development on the habitat and character and appearance of the area
- whether or not the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies
What decided it
The undue and unacceptable harm to the woodland habitat and character and appearance of the area, combined with the modest number of dwellings proposed, means the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits even in the context of the Council's severe housing land supply shortfall.
The benefits of delivering 4-5 dwellings in a context of severe housing undersupply (1.92 years) were attributed limited weight; the substantial harm to habitat, character and appearance and conflict with development plan policies was attributed substantial weight; the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP18Policy CSP20Policy CSP21Policy DP7Policy DP19
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 187Paragraph 232
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®