Planning appeal decision
Land at Old Coach House 26A Old Ferry Drive, Wraysbury, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW19 5JT
Planning appeal 3373053 at Land at Old Coach House 26A Old Ferry Drive, Wraysbury, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW19 5JT (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 22 June 2026 by Inspector Kean G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.
Material change of use of land to a caravan site for residential purposes and erection of structures off northeast and southeast elevations of existing building with metal containers
- Appeal type
- minor · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Kean G
- Postcode
- TW19 5JT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- character and appearance
- risk of flooding
- ecological impacts
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness which is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist to justify the proposal.
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including the modest contribution to housing supply and the benefit of bringing a derelict site into positive use, which carried at most limited weight.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP5Policy QP3Policy NR1Policy NR2Policy NR3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 154c
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353234Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 202633621832 Aston Mead, Windsor, SL4 5PW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®