Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 March 20263373060

503 Clifton Lane, NOTTINGHAM, NG11 8NA

the erection of two restaurants with drive through facilities (Class A3/A5) with variation of condition S1 of planning permission reference 12/01824/PFUL3 to revise the site layout to provide a Drive Thru Lane with double ordering points for unit B without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 13/01393/PVAR3 (PP- 02687080), dated 7 August 2013

Authority
Nottingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Spataru A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect that varying the opening hours for customer deliveries would have on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to noise and activity

What decided it

The absence of robust, deliverable mitigation measures for plant noise that would demonstrably reduce noise to acceptable levels for neighbouring residential dwellings.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy 10 of the Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough Gedling Borough Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan 2014, Policy LS1 of the Nottingham City Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document Local Plan Part 2 2020, Policy DE1 of the Nottingham City Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document Local Plan Part 2 2020, Policy IN2 of the Nottingham City Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document Local Plan Part 2 2020, Policy BE2 of the Nottingham Local Plan, Policy BE3 of the Nottingham Local Plan, Policy NE9 of the Nottingham Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.