Planning appeal decision
17 Hollow Street, Chislet, Kent, CT3 4DS
Planning appeal 3373078 at 17 Hollow Street, Chislet, Kent, CT3 4DS (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 9 February 2026 by Inspector Douglas L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's decision to refuse to issue a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded.
existing use of building and land as residential
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Douglas L
- Postcode
- CT3 4DS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse to issue a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded
What decided it
The appellant failed to provide sufficiently precise and unambiguous evidence on the balance of probabilities to establish that an existing residential use should be certified as lawful.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Split Decision2 June 20263332446Four Buoys , Radfall Ride , Whitstable , CT3 3EW
- Invalid9 April 20263343204Land North West of Swanton Lane, Sturry, Canterbury, Kent , CT3 4AX
- Planning permission granted11 March 20263334788118 Clare Road, Whitstable, Kent, CT5 2EH
- Notice varied and upheld19 February 20263334865Beggars Roost, Woolage Green, Canterbury, CT4 6SF
- Notice varied and upheld15 December 20253358538Moate Farm, Stodmarsh Road, Canterbury, Kent, CT3 4AP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®