Planning appeal decision
Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX
Planning appeal 3373183 at Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX (Canterbury City Council) was allowed on 26 February 2026 by Inspector Hartley D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including landscape character.
an outline planning application for up to 300 residential dwellings (including affordable housing and older person accommodation), a new community hub, introduction of structural planting and landscaping, informal public open space and children’s play area and surface water flood mitigation and attenuation (all matters reserved)
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hartley D
- Postcode
- CT3 1UX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including landscape character.
- The suitability of the submitted Travel Plan and whether the proposal would accord with the transport strategy in Policy T1 of the adopted Canterbury Local Plan 2017 (LP), including providing alternative modes of transport to the car by extending provision for pedestrians, cyclists and the use of public transport.
- The effect of the development on the Chalk Stream.
- Whether the proposal would be capable of providing adequate sewage disposal.
- The effect of the proposal on best and most versatile agricultural land, including whether it complies with policy EMP12 of the LP.
- In the context of the undisputed evidence that the local planning authority (LPA) cannot demonstrate a five year supply of deliverable housing sites, whether any adverse impacts arising from the proposal would significantly and demonstrably outweigh any identified benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, having particular regard to key policies for directing development to sustainable locations, making effective use of land, securing well-designed places and providing affordable homes, individually or in combination, and whether the proposal would deliver sustainable development.
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites engaged the tilted balance, and the very significant benefits of delivering up to 300 dwellings (including affordable and older persons' housing) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the identified harms.
The very significant benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, the link road, biodiversity net gain and other benefits were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate/minor landscape harm, less-than-substantial heritage harm, and limited harm from loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, so the tilted balance favoured granting permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy T1Policy EMP12Policy LB4Policy QL12Policy CC11Policy CC13Policy HD2Policy HD4Policy SP4Policy SP1Policy DBE1Policy DBE3Policy DBE5Policy LB9Policy LB10Policy HE11Policy HE12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 50Paragraph 57Paragraph 58Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 109Paragraph 116Paragraph 135Paragraph 187Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed26 March 20263374468The Orchard Marley Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6JH
- Allowed5 March 20263374628Assemble Spaces, Albert Hall Albert Street, Whitstable, CT5 1HT
- Notice varied and upheld13 August 20253362152Land at Romany Green Acre, Well Lane, Fordwich, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 0DU
- Dismissed22 May 20253358230143 Faversham Road, Seasalter, Kent, CT5 4SD
- Dismissed21 May 2025335911713 Gordon Road, Herne Bay, CT6 5QX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®