Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 February 20263373183

Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX

Planning appeal 3373183 at Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX (Canterbury City Council) was allowed on 26 February 2026 by Inspector Hartley D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including landscape character.

an outline planning application for up to 300 residential dwellings (including affordable housing and older person accommodation), a new community hub, introduction of structural planting and landscaping, informal public open space and children’s play area and surface water flood mitigation and attenuation (all matters reserved)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Hartley D
Postcode
CT3 1UX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including landscape character.
  • The suitability of the submitted Travel Plan and whether the proposal would accord with the transport strategy in Policy T1 of the adopted Canterbury Local Plan 2017 (LP), including providing alternative modes of transport to the car by extending provision for pedestrians, cyclists and the use of public transport.
  • The effect of the development on the Chalk Stream.
  • Whether the proposal would be capable of providing adequate sewage disposal.
  • The effect of the proposal on best and most versatile agricultural land, including whether it complies with policy EMP12 of the LP.
  • In the context of the undisputed evidence that the local planning authority (LPA) cannot demonstrate a five year supply of deliverable housing sites, whether any adverse impacts arising from the proposal would significantly and demonstrably outweigh any identified benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, having particular regard to key policies for directing development to sustainable locations, making effective use of land, securing well-designed places and providing affordable homes, individually or in combination, and whether the proposal would deliver sustainable development.

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites engaged the tilted balance, and the very significant benefits of delivering up to 300 dwellings (including affordable and older persons' housing) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the identified harms.

The very significant benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, the link road, biodiversity net gain and other benefits were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate/minor landscape harm, less-than-substantial heritage harm, and limited harm from loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, so the tilted balance favoured granting permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T1Policy EMP12Policy LB4Policy QL12Policy CC11Policy CC13Policy HD2Policy HD4Policy SP4Policy SP1Policy DBE1Policy DBE3Policy DBE5Policy LB9Policy LB10Policy HE11Policy HE12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 50Paragraph 57Paragraph 58Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 109Paragraph 116Paragraph 135Paragraph 187Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed26 March 20263374468
    The Orchard Marley Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6JH
  2. Allowed5 March 20263374628
    Assemble Spaces, Albert Hall Albert Street, Whitstable, CT5 1HT
  3. Notice varied and upheld13 August 20253362152
    Land at Romany Green Acre, Well Lane, Fordwich, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 0DU
  4. Dismissed22 May 20253358230
    143 Faversham Road, Seasalter, Kent, CT5 4SD
  5. Dismissed21 May 20253359117
    13 Gordon Road, Herne Bay, CT6 5QX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.