®Planning appeal decision
Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX
an outline planning application for up to 300 residential dwellings (including affordable housing and older person accommodation), a new community hub, introduction of structural planting and landscaping, informal public open space and children’s play area and surface water flood mitigation and attenuation (all matters reserved)
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hartley D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including landscape character.
- The suitability of the submitted Travel Plan and whether the proposal would accord with the transport strategy in Policy T1 of the adopted Canterbury Local Plan 2017 (LP), including providing alternative modes of transport to the car by extending provision for pedestrians, cyclists and the use of public transport.
- The effect of the development on the Chalk Stream.
- Whether the proposal would be capable of providing adequate sewage disposal.
- The effect of the proposal on best and most versatile agricultural land, including whether it complies with policy EMP12 of the LP.
- In the context of the undisputed evidence that the local planning authority (LPA) cannot demonstrate a five year supply of deliverable housing sites, whether any adverse impacts arising from the proposal would significantly and demonstrably outweigh any identified benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, having particular regard to key policies for directing development to sustainable locations, making effective use of land, securing well-designed places and providing affordable homes, individually or in combination, and whether the proposal would deliver sustainable development.
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites engaged the tilted balance, and the very significant benefits of delivering up to 300 dwellings (including affordable and older persons' housing) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the identified harms.
The very significant benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, the link road, biodiversity net gain and other benefits were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate/minor landscape harm, less-than-substantial heritage harm, and limited harm from loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, so the tilted balance favoured granting permission.
Framework references: 11, 50, 57, 58, 83, 84, 109, 116, 135, 187, 215
Plan policies cited: Policy T1, Policy EMP12, Policy LB4, Policy QL12, Policy CC11, Policy CC13, Policy HD2, Policy HD4, Policy SP4, Policy SP1, Policy DBE1, Policy DBE3, Policy DBE5, Policy LB9, Policy LB10, Policy HE11, Policy HE12
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.